NCERT Solutions for Class 11 Political Science Chapter 2: Rights in the Indian Constitution (NCERT 2026–27)

These Class 11 Political Science Chapter 2 solutions cover Rights in the Indian Constitution from the textbook Indian Constitution at Work (continued for the 2026–27 session). The chapter explains why a democracy needs a bill of rights, lists the six Fundamental Rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution, shows how the judiciary protects and expands these rights through writs, and clarifies the difference between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy. Below you get every end-of-chapter Exercise question reproduced verbatim and answered in exam-ready style, plus key terms, extra practice, MCQs, Assertion–Reason questions and FAQs.

Class: 11 Subject: Political Science Book: Indian Constitution at Work Chapter: 2 Chapter Name: Rights in the Indian Constitution Session: 2026–27
On this page

Class 11 Political Science Chapter 2 – Overview

Chapter 2, Rights in the Indian Constitution, begins by showing why rights matter in real life — through the Asian Games construction workers denied minimum wages (a violation of the right against exploitation) and Machal Lalung, who spent 54 years in custody without trial (a denial of the right to life and liberty). A democracy lists the rights of citizens in its constitution as a bill of rights so that the government must respect them and provide a remedy when they are violated. Part III of the Indian Constitution guarantees six Fundamental Rights: the Right to Equality, Right to Freedom, Right against Exploitation, Right to Freedom of Religion, Cultural and Educational Rights, and the Right to Constitutional Remedies — which Dr. Ambedkar called the ‘heart and soul of the Constitution’. These rights are not absolute; the government may impose reasonable restrictions. The chapter also explains the Directive Principles of State Policy (non-justiciable goals, policies and rights), the relationship and occasional conflict between rights and Directive Principles, the removal of the right to property as a Fundamental Right (44th Amendment, 1978), and the protective role of the judiciary and bodies like the National Human Rights Commission.

Key Concepts & Terms

Bill of Rights: a list of the rights of citizens mentioned and protected by the constitution itself; it prohibits the government from acting against these rights and ensures a remedy when they are violated.

Fundamental Rights: the rights listed and specially protected by Part III of the Constitution. Unlike ordinary legal rights, they can be changed only by amending the Constitution, and no organ of the government may act in a manner that violates them.

The six Fundamental Rights: Right to Equality, Right to Freedom, Right against Exploitation, Right to Freedom of Religion, Cultural and Educational Rights, and Right to Constitutional Remedies.

Right to Equality: equality before law and equal protection of laws, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, equality of opportunity in public employment, abolition of untouchability and abolition of titles.

Right to Freedom: freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association, movement, residence and profession, along with protection in respect of conviction for offences, the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), and protection against arrest and detention.

Preventive detention: arrest of a person out of an apprehension that they may commit an unlawful act, without the usual procedure; it can be extended only for three months before review by an advisory board, and is often criticised as open to misuse.

Right against Exploitation: prohibition of begar (forced labour) and traffic in human beings, and prohibition of employment of children below 14 in hazardous jobs.

Right to Freedom of Religion: freedom of conscience and the freedom to profess, practise and propagate any religion, subject to public order, morality and health; the state extends equal treatment to all religions (secularism).

Cultural and Educational Rights: the right of religious and linguistic minorities to conserve their language, script and culture, and to establish and administer their own educational institutions.

Right to Constitutional Remedies: the right to move the High Courts or Supreme Court to enforce Fundamental Rights; the courts issue special orders called writs — Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto and Certiorari.

Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP): a list of non-justiciable guidelines (goals, policies and rights) that the government should follow; they cannot be enforced by the judiciary but carry a moral force.

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC): a body established by law in 1993 to protect human rights through inquiry and recommendation; it has no power of prosecution.

NCERT Exercises — Full Solutions

All questions below are reproduced verbatim from the NCERT textbook’s end-of-chapter Exercises section. Answers are original, written in exam-ready style.

1. Write true or false against each of these statements: a) A Bill of Rights lays down the rights enjoyed by the people of a country. b) A Bill of Rights protects the liberties of an individual. c) Every country of the world has a Bill of Rights. d) The Constitution guarantees remedy against violation of Rights.

ANSWER a) True — a Bill of Rights is precisely a list of the rights mentioned and protected by the constitution and enjoyed by the people. b) True — by binding the government to respect rights and providing a remedy, a Bill of Rights protects the liberties of the individual. c) False — not every country has a Bill of Rights; only some democratic countries list and protect rights in their constitution itself. d) True — the Right to Constitutional Remedies guarantees a remedy by allowing citizens to approach the High Courts or Supreme Court when a right is violated.

2. Which of the following is the best description of Fundamental Rights? a) All the rights an individual should have. b) All the rights given to citizens by law. c) The rights given and protected by the Constitution. d) The rights given by the Constitution that cannot ever be restricted.

ANSWER (c) The rights given and protected by the Constitution. Fundamental Rights are those rights that are specially listed and guaranteed by the Constitution and can be changed only by amending it. Option (a) is too broad and moral rather than legal; option (b) describes ordinary legal rights; option (d) is wrong because Fundamental Rights are not absolute — the government can place reasonable restrictions on them.

3. Read the following situations. Which Fundamental Right is being used or violated in each case and how? a) Overweight male cabin crew are allowed to get promotion in the national airlines but their women colleagues who gain weight are penalised. b) A director makes a documentary film that criticises the policies of the government. c) People displaced by a big dam take out a rally demanding rehabilitation. d) Andhra society runs Telugu medium schools outside Andhra Pradesh.

ANSWER a) Violation of the Right to Equality. Treating men and women differently for the same condition (gaining weight) is discrimination on the ground of sex and denies equality of opportunity in employment. b) Use of the Right to Freedom — specifically the freedom of speech and expression. A film-maker is free to criticise government policies as part of this right. c) Use of the Right to Freedom — the freedom to assemble peacefully and to express demands. Holding a rally to demand rehabilitation is a peaceful exercise of this right. d) Use of the Cultural and Educational Rights. A linguistic minority (Telugu-speakers outside Andhra Pradesh) has the right to conserve its language and culture and to establish educational institutions for this purpose.

4. Which of the following is a correct interpretation of the Cultural and Educational Rights? a) Only children belonging to the minority group that has opened educational institution can study there. b) Government schools must ensure that children of the minority group will be introduced to their belief and culture. c) Linguistic and religious minorities can open schools for their children and keep it reserved for them. d) Linguistic and religious minorities can demand that their children must not study in any educational institution except those managed by their own community.

ANSWER (c) Linguistic and religious minorities can open schools for their children and keep it reserved for them. The Cultural and Educational Rights give minorities the right to establish and administer their own educational institutions in order to conserve their language, script and culture. Option (a) is too restrictive, option (b) wrongly places the duty on government schools, and option (d) wrongly suggests minorities can be barred from other institutions — which is not part of these rights.

5. Which of the following is a violation of Fundamental Rights and why? a) Not paying minimum wages b) Banning of a book c) Banning of loudspeakers after 9 pm. d) Making a speech

ANSWER (a) Not paying minimum wages is a violation of Fundamental Rights. Employing a person to work for less than the minimum prescribed wage amounts to begar or forced labour, which violates the Right against Exploitation. (This was the principle laid down in the Asian Games workers’ case.) The others are not violations: (b) banning a book can be a reasonable restriction on free speech in the interest of public order or morality; (c) banning loudspeakers after 9 pm is a reasonable restriction to protect public order and health; (d) making a speech is itself an exercise of the right to freedom of speech and expression, not a violation.

6. An activist working among the poor says that the poor don’t need Fundamental Rights. What they need are Directive Principles to be made legally binding. Do you agree with this? Give your reasons.

ANSWER I do not fully agree. The poor need both Fundamental Rights and the goals contained in the Directive Principles. It would be wrong to give up Fundamental Rights in exchange for enforceable Directive Principles. Fundamental Rights protect the poor in crucial ways: the Right against Exploitation guards them against forced labour, bonded labour and child labour; the Right to Equality protects them against discrimination based on caste; the Right to Constitutional Remedies lets them approach the courts when wronged. The Asian Games workers won their wages only because the right against exploitation was enforceable. At the same time, the Directive Principles aim directly at the welfare of the poor — adequate livelihood, equal pay for equal work, the right to work, and so on. Making more of them effective would certainly help. But the right way is to strengthen the implementation of Directive Principles while keeping Fundamental Rights intact, since the courts have themselves expanded the right to life to include shelter, livelihood and dignity. The two are complementary, not substitutes.

7. Several reports show that caste groups previously associated with scavenging are forced to continue in this job. Those in positions of authority refuse to give them any other job. Their children are discouraged from pursuing education. Which of their Fundamental Rights are being violated in this instance?

ANSWER Several Fundamental Rights are being violated in this case: 1. Right to Equality — forcing certain caste groups to continue in scavenging and denying them other jobs is discrimination based on caste and a denial of equality of opportunity in employment; it also amounts to a form of untouchability, which is abolished. 2. Right against Exploitation — compelling people to continue degrading work against their will is a form of forced labour. 3. Right to Freedom — the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), which the Supreme Court has held includes the right to live with human dignity, is denied to them. 4. Right to Education (part of the Right to Freedom) — discouraging their children from pursuing education violates the right to education that is now a Fundamental Right for children.

8. A petition by a human rights group drew attention of the court to the condition of starvation and hunger in the country. Over five crore tonnes of food grains was stored in the godowns of the Food Corporation of India. Research shows that a large number of ration cardholders do not know about the quantity of food grains they can purchase from fair price shops. It requested the court to order the government to improve its public distribution system. a. Which different rights does this case involve? How are these rights interlinked? b. Should these rights form part of the right to life?

ANSWER a) Rights involved and how they are linked: The case involves the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), which the Supreme Court has interpreted to include the right to live with dignity, the right to food and the right to livelihood. It also draws on the Right to Constitutional Remedies, since the human rights group approached the court directly to enforce these rights. In addition, the Directive Principle that the state should secure an adequate livelihood and raise the level of nutrition is relevant. These rights are interlinked because a person cannot enjoy the right to life if they are starving; the right to food, the right to livelihood and the right to a fair public distribution system together give real meaning to the right to life, and the Right to Constitutional Remedies is the tool that makes them enforceable. b) Yes, these rights should form part of the right to life. No person can live without the means of living. The right to life is meaningless if people die of hunger while food grains rot in godowns. Just as the Supreme Court has already held that shelter, livelihood and dignity are part of the right to life, the right to food and access to a functioning public distribution system should also be read into Article 21. This makes the right to life substantive rather than merely a guarantee against the taking away of life.

9. Read the statement by Somnath Lahiri in the Constituent Assembly quoted in this chapter. Do you agree with him? If yes, give instances to prove it. If not, give arguments against his position.

ANSWER Somnath Lahiri criticised the draft Fundamental Rights for being framed ‘from the point of view of a police constable’ — conceding minimum rights and then almost completely taking them away through provisos and restrictions. Points in his favour: There is some truth in his criticism. Almost every freedom under the Right to Freedom is followed by restrictions — freedom of speech is subject to public order and morality, freedom of assembly can be curbed by declaring an assembly of five or more persons unlawful, and the existence of preventive detention allows the government to arrest a person merely out of apprehension. Such provisions have been misused against genuine protest. Arguments against his position: However, his criticism is partly overstated. No right can be absolute, because one person’s unlimited freedom would destroy the freedom of others and threaten public order. Reasonable restrictions are therefore necessary. Moreover, the judiciary has acted as a strong protector of rights since 1950, striking down unreasonable laws and expanding the scope of rights (for example, reading dignity, shelter and livelihood into Article 21). So while Lahiri rightly warned against excessive restrictions, the rights have proved more robust in practice than he feared.

10. Which of the Fundamental Rights is in your opinion the most important right? Summarise its provisions and give arguments to show why it is most important.

ANSWER In my opinion, the Right to Constitutional Remedies is the most important Fundamental Right. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar himself called it the ‘heart and soul of the Constitution’. Provisions: This right allows a citizen whose Fundamental Right has been violated to move directly to a High Court or the Supreme Court for its enforcement. The courts can issue special orders called writs: Habeas Corpus (to produce an arrested person before the court and free them if the arrest is unlawful), Mandamus (to order an office holder to do their legal duty), Prohibition (to stop a lower court exceeding its jurisdiction), Quo Warranto (to restrain a person from holding an office they are not entitled to) and Certiorari (to transfer a case to a higher authority). Why it is the most important: Merely listing rights is not enough; rights have value only if they can be defended and realised in practice. The Right to Constitutional Remedies makes all the other Fundamental Rights enforceable — without it, equality, freedom and protection against exploitation would remain words on paper. It is the mechanism that gives life to the whole list of rights, which is why it is rightly regarded as the most important.

Extra Practice Questions

Short Answer Type Questions

Q1. What is a ‘bill of rights’?

ANSWERA bill of rights is a list of the rights of citizens that is mentioned and protected by the constitution itself. It prohibits the government from acting against these rights and ensures a remedy if they are violated.

Q2. How are Fundamental Rights different from ordinary legal rights?

ANSWEROrdinary legal rights are protected by ordinary law and can be changed by the legislature through the normal law-making process. Fundamental Rights are protected and guaranteed by the Constitution and can be changed only by amending the Constitution; moreover, no organ of the government may violate them.

Q3. What is preventive detention and what is its limit?

ANSWERPreventive detention is the arrest of a person out of an apprehension that they are likely to engage in unlawful activity, without the usual arrest procedure. Such detention can be extended only for three months, after which the case must be placed before an advisory board for review. It is often criticised as being open to misuse.

Q4. Name the five writs the courts can issue under the Right to Constitutional Remedies.

ANSWERThe five writs are Habeas Corpus (produce the arrested person), Mandamus (compel an office holder to do legal duty), Prohibition (stop a lower court exceeding jurisdiction), Quo Warranto (restrain a person wrongly holding office) and Certiorari (transfer a case to a higher court or authority).

Q5. Why are the Directive Principles called ‘non-justiciable’?

ANSWERThe Directive Principles are called non-justiciable because they cannot be enforced by the judiciary. If a government fails to implement a Directive Principle, citizens cannot go to court to compel the government to do so; the Principles rely on moral force and public pressure instead.

Long Answer Type Questions

Q1. Discuss the provisions of the Right to Equality under the Indian Constitution.

ANSWERThe Right to Equality is one of the most important Fundamental Rights and seeks to make India a true democracy by ensuring equal dignity and status for all citizens. Its main provisions are: equality before law and equal protection of laws, so that all persons are treated equally by the legal system; prohibition of discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, including equal access to public places such as shops, hotels, wells, bathing ghats and roads; equality of opportunity in public employment; abolition of untouchability, one of the crudest manifestations of inequality; and abolition of titles, except military and academic honours. The Constitution also clarifies, through Article 16(4), that special schemes and reservations for women, children and the socially and educationally backward classes are not a violation of this right but are required to make equality of opportunity real in a society marked by deep social inequalities.

Q2. Explain the relationship between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy.

ANSWERFundamental Rights and Directive Principles are best seen as complementary to each other. Fundamental Rights mainly restrain the government from acting against the rights of individuals, while Directive Principles exhort the government to take positive steps for the welfare of the whole society. Together they aim at a just society. However, the two can sometimes conflict. When the government tried to abolish the zamindari system to give effect to the Directive Principles, the measures were opposed for violating the then Fundamental Right to property. The government argued that rights could be abridged to implement Directive Principles, while the courts initially held that Fundamental Rights were too important to be limited. This led to a long legal battle, the removal of the right to property from the list of Fundamental Rights by the 44th Amendment (1978), and finally the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), in which the Supreme Court ruled that Parliament can amend the Constitution but cannot alter its basic structure. The overall principle is that rights and Directive Principles should be balanced, keeping in mind both individual liberty and the welfare of society.

Q3. Describe the Right to Freedom of Religion and explain why it is subject to limitations.

ANSWERThe Right to Freedom of Religion guarantees that everyone in India is free to choose, practise and follow the religion of their choice. It includes freedom of conscience — a person may follow any religion or none — and the freedom to profess, practise and propagate religion. It also ensures the equal treatment of all religions by the state: India has no official religion, the state will not favour any religion in employment, and state institutions will not impose religious instruction, all of which nurture the principle of secularism. However, this right is not unlimited. The government can place restrictions to protect public order, morality and health, and to root out social evils — which is why practices like sati, bigamy and human sacrifice could be banned without these bans being treated as interference in religion. The Constitution also protects freedom to propagate religion but does not permit forcible conversions based on intimidation or inducement. These limitations are necessary so that religious freedom does not harm others or public welfare, even though they sometimes create tension between religious groups and the government.

MCQs & Assertion–Reason

1. Which part of the Indian Constitution lists the Fundamental Rights?

(a) Part I    (b) Part II    (c) Part III    (d) Part IV

2. How many Fundamental Rights are currently guaranteed by the Constitution?

(a) Five    (b) Six    (c) Seven    (d) Eight

3. Who described the Right to Constitutional Remedies as the ‘heart and soul of the Constitution’?

(a) Jawaharlal Nehru    (b) Sardar Patel    (c) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar    (d) Somnath Lahiri

4. The writ that orders an arrested person to be presented before the court is:

(a) Mandamus    (b) Habeas Corpus    (c) Quo Warranto    (d) Certiorari

5. Begar or forced labour without payment is prohibited under the:

(a) Right to Equality    (b) Right to Freedom    (c) Right against Exploitation    (d) Cultural and Educational Rights

6. Preventive detention can ordinarily be extended only for a maximum period of:

(a) One month    (b) Three months    (c) Six months    (d) One year

7. By which amendment was the Right to Property removed from the list of Fundamental Rights?

(a) 42nd Amendment    (b) 44th Amendment    (c) 1st Amendment    (d) 73rd Amendment

8. Article 21 of the Constitution deals with:

(a) Equality before law    (b) Freedom of religion    (c) Protection of life and personal liberty    (d) Reservation in jobs

9. The Directive Principles of State Policy are best described as:

(a) Justiciable rights enforceable by courts    (b) Non-justiciable guidelines for the government    (c) Duties of citizens    (d) Powers of the President

10. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was established in the year:

(a) 1950    (b) 1976    (c) 1993    (d) 2005

Answer key: 1-(c), 2-(b), 3-(c), 4-(b), 5-(c), 6-(b), 7-(b), 8-(c), 9-(b), 10-(c).

For each Assertion–Reason question, choose: (A) Both true and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion; (B) Both true but the Reason is not the correct explanation; (C) Assertion true, Reason false; (D) Assertion false, Reason true.

A-R 1. Assertion: Fundamental Rights can be changed only by amending the Constitution.

Reason: Fundamental Rights are protected and guaranteed by the Constitution, unlike ordinary legal rights changed by ordinary law.

A-R 2. Assertion: Fundamental Rights are absolute and can never be restricted.

Reason: The government can place reasonable restrictions on the exercise of Fundamental Rights.

A-R 3. Assertion: The Right to Constitutional Remedies is called the heart and soul of the Constitution.

Reason: It allows citizens to approach the courts to get any violated Fundamental Right enforced.

A-R 4. Assertion: The Directive Principles of State Policy cannot be enforced by the judiciary.

Reason: The Directive Principles are non-justiciable guidelines that rely on moral force rather than legal compulsion.

A-R 5. Assertion: Reservation in jobs for backward classes violates the Right to Equality.

Reason: Article 16(4) allows the State to reserve posts for backward classes not adequately represented in services.

Answer key: 1-(A), 2-(D), 3-(A), 4-(A), 5-(D).

Exam Tips & Common Mistakes

How to score full marks in this chapter

Memorise the six Fundamental Rights in order and at least two provisions of each. For ‘which right is used/violated’ questions, always name the right and then give a one-line reason. Remember the key facts examiners love: Article 21 (life and liberty), preventive detention limit of three months, the five writs, the 44th Amendment (1978) removing the right to property, the Kesavananda Bharati basic-structure case, Ambedkar’s ‘heart and soul’ remark, and the NHRC (1993). Use the chapter’s real examples — the Asian Games workers and Machal Lalung — to add weight to your answers on the importance of rights.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Saying Fundamental Rights are “absolute” — they are subject to reasonable restrictions.
  • Confusing Fundamental Rights (justiciable, Part III) with Directive Principles (non-justiciable, Part IV).
  • Forgetting that the right to property is now only a legal right (Article 300A), not a Fundamental Right.
  • Mixing up the five writs — learn the exact purpose of Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto and Certiorari.
  • Treating reservation as a violation of equality — Article 16(4) makes it constitutionally valid.
  • Writing one-word answers for ‘which right is violated’ questions — always add the reason.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chapter 2 of Class 11 Political Science (Indian Constitution at Work) about?

Chapter 2, Rights in the Indian Constitution, explains why a democracy needs a bill of rights, lists the six Fundamental Rights in Part III, describes how the judiciary protects them through writs, and clarifies the difference between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy.

What are the six Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution?

The six Fundamental Rights are the Right to Equality, Right to Freedom, Right against Exploitation, Right to Freedom of Religion, Cultural and Educational Rights, and the Right to Constitutional Remedies.

Why is the Right to Constitutional Remedies called the ‘heart and soul of the Constitution’?

Dr. Ambedkar gave it this name because it makes all the other Fundamental Rights enforceable. It lets a citizen approach the High Court or Supreme Court, which can issue writs to restore any violated right, so the listed rights become real rather than mere words on paper.

← Chapter 1: Constitution – Why and How? Chapter 3: Election and Representation →
Scroll to Top