NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Political Science Chapter 8: Recent Developments in Indian Politics (NCERT 2026–27)

These Class 12 Political Science Chapter 8 solutions cover Recent Developments in Indian Politics, the concluding chapter of Politics in India Since Independence. The chapter offers a synoptic view of the last few decades of Indian politics — the era of coalitions after 1989, the rise of the Mandal issue and OBC politics, the Ayodhya (Ram Janmabhoomi) dispute and the debate over secularism, the emergence of the BJP and the BSP, and the new policy consensus that runs across most parties. Below you get verbatim NCERT exercise questions with detailed, exam-ready answers, key terms, extra practice, MCQs, Assertion–Reason questions and FAQs.

Class: 12 Subject: Political Science Book: Politics in India Since Independence Chapter: 8 Theme: Coalition era, Mandal & Ayodhya, new consensus Session: 2026–27
On this page

Class 12 Political Science Chapter 8 – Overview

Chapter 8, Recent Developments in Indian Politics, takes a synoptic view of Indian politics since the late 1980s. As the decade of the eighties closed, five developments reshaped politics: the defeat of the Congress in 1989 (ending the ‘Congress system’), the rise of the Mandal issue after the National Front decided to implement OBC reservation, the launch of the new economic reforms in 1991, the Ram Janmabhoomi (Ayodhya) dispute, and the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in 1991. The 1989 elections gave no party a majority and began a long era of coalition governments (National Front, United Front, the BJP-led NDA, and the Congress-led UPA), in which regional and state-level parties became central. The chapter also traces the political rise of the OBCs through the Mandal Commission and the assertion of Dalit politics through the BSP under Kanshi Ram, the growth of the BJP and the politics of Hindutva, and the resolution of the Ayodhya issue by the Supreme Court’s verdict of 9 November 2019. It concludes that despite intense competition, a broad consensus has emerged among most parties on four issues: new economic policies, the claims of the backward castes, the role of state-level parties, and pragmatic (rather than ideological) coalition politics.

Key Concepts & Terms

The ‘Congress system’: the long period of Congress dominance, when the party itself functioned as a broad coalition of diverse interests and social groups. The 1989 defeat marked its end, though the Congress remained an important party.

Era of coalitions: the phase after 1989 when no single party won a clear Lok Sabha majority (until 2014), so governments at the Centre were either coalitions or minority governments supported from outside — National Front (1989), United Front (1996–97), NDA (1998, 1999), UPA (2004, 2009).

Mandal issue: the dispute between supporters and opponents of OBC reservation, triggered when the National Front government in 1990 decided to implement the Mandal Commission’s recommendation to reserve central government jobs for Other Backward Classes; it led to violent anti-Mandal protests.

Mandal Commission: the Second Backward Classes Commission (1978–80), chaired by B.P. Mandal, which recommended reserving 27 per cent of seats in education and government jobs for OBCs. Its implementation was upheld by the Supreme Court in the Indira Sawhney case (November 1992).

Other Backward Classes (OBCs): communities other than SCs and STs that suffer from educational and social backwardness (‘backward castes’); their political rise was a major long-term development of this period.

Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP): a party that emerged from BAMCEF (1978) under the leadership of Kanshi Ram, drawing strong support from Dalit voters and achieving a breakthrough in Uttar Pradesh in 1989 and 1991.

Hindutva: the idea, popularised by V.D. Savarkar, that to be Indian one must accept India as both fatherland (pitrubhu) and holy land (punyabhu); from the late 1980s the BJP used it for political mobilisation.

Ayodhya / Ram Janmabhoomi issue: the long legal-political dispute over the disputed site in Ayodhya, central to the politics of the 1990s; it was finally resolved by a 5-0 verdict of a constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on 9 November 2019, which allotted the site to the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teertha Kshetra Trust and directed an alternative site for a mosque.

New economic reforms: the structural adjustment programme begun around 1991, which changed the direction of the economy; though criticised by many movements, successive governments continued it.

The new consensus: the broad agreement among most parties on (i) the new economic policies, (ii) acceptance of the social and political claims of the backward castes, (iii) the role of state-level parties in national governance, and (iv) pragmatic considerations over ideology in forming alliances.

NCERT Exercise – Full Solutions

All questions below are reproduced verbatim from the NCERT textbook’s end-of-chapter exercises. Answers are original, written in exam-ready style.

1. Unscramble a bunch of disarranged press clipping file of Unni-Munni… and arrange the file chronologically.

(a) Implementation of the recommendation of the Mandal Commission(b) Formation of the Janata Dal(c) Supreme court Judgment on the Ram Janmabhoomi(d) Assassination of Indira Gandhi(e) The formation of NDA government(f) Formation of the UPA government

ANSWER Arranged in correct chronological order, with the year of each event:
OrderEventYear
1(d) Assassination of Indira Gandhi1984
2(b) Formation of the Janata Dal1988
3(a) Implementation of the recommendation of the Mandal Commission1990
4(e) The formation of NDA government1998
5(f) Formation of the UPA government2004
6(c) Supreme Court Judgment on the Ram Janmabhoomi2019
So the correct sequence is: (d) → (b) → (a) → (e) → (f) → (c).

2. Match the following.

(a) Politics of Consensus(b) Caste based parties(c) Personal Law and Gender Justice(d) Growing strength of Regional partiesi. Shah Bano caseii. Rise of OBCsiii. Coalition governmentiv. Agreement on Economic policies

ANSWER
Column AColumn B
(a) Politics of Consensusiv. Agreement on Economic policies
(b) Caste based partiesii. Rise of OBCs
(c) Personal Law and Gender Justicei. Shah Bano case
(d) Growing strength of Regional partiesiii. Coalition government
Thus: (a)–iv, (b)–ii, (c)–i, (d)–iii.

3. State the main issues in Indian politics in the period after 1989. What different configurations of political parties these differences lead to?

ANSWER Main issues after 1989: (i) the decline of Congress dominance and the rise of a multi-party system; (ii) the Mandal issue — the implementation of OBC reservation and the resulting debate over social justice; (iii) the new economic reforms begun in 1991; (iv) the Ayodhya / Ram Janmabhoomi dispute and the larger debate over secularism, communalism and democracy; and (v) the rise of regional and state-level parties, which became central to forming governments. Configurations these differences led to: Because no single party won a clear majority, politics organised itself into alliances and coalitions. The National Front (1989) was supported from outside by two opposite groups — the BJP and the Left — who both wanted to keep the Congress out. The United Front (1996) was supported by the Congress, as both wanted to keep the BJP out. Later, competition crystallised mainly into two broad coalitions: the BJP-led NDA and the Congress-led UPA, with several regional parties aligning with one or the other. This unstable, shifting set of alliances shows how the issues of the period produced a politics of coalitions rather than single-party rule.

4. “In the new era of coalition politics, political parties are not aligning or re-aligning on the basis of ideology.” What arguments would you put forward to support or oppose this statement?

ANSWER Arguments supporting the statement (alignments are not ideological): In coalition politics the focus has shifted from ideological differences to power-sharing arrangements. The same parties supported governments for opposite reasons — the BJP and the Left both backed the National Front in 1989. Most parties in the NDA did not agree with the BJP’s Hindutva ideology, yet they came together to form a government and ran a full term. Alliances are often formed for pragmatic reasons — gaining or retaining power — and parties frequently switch sides, which shows ideology is not the basis. Arguments opposing the statement (ideology still matters): A broad policy consensus has itself emerged — on the new economic policies, the claims of backward castes, and the role of state-level parties — which is a kind of shared ideological ground. Parties still cluster around two poles partly on the basis of their stand for or against the BJP’s ideology and secularism. Long-standing partners often share regional or social commitments. Conclusion: On balance, the statement is largely true for the coalition era — pragmatic power-sharing has overtaken ideology as the main basis of alignment, though a residual ideological positioning (for or against a particular party’s outlook) has not disappeared entirely.

5. Trace the emergence of BJP as a significant force in post-Emergency politics.

ANSWER After the Emergency, the Bharatiya Jana Sangh merged with the Janata Party. When the Janata Party broke up, the former Jana Sangh members formed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 1980. Initially the BJP adopted a broad platform of ‘Gandhian socialism’ along with cultural nationalism, but it had little success in the 1984 elections (winning only two seats). After 1986 the BJP began to emphasise nationalism as the core of its ideology and pursued the politics of Hindutva for mobilisation. Two developments around 1986 helped it: the Shah Bano case (1985), which the BJP used to criticise the Congress for ‘appeasement’, and the Ayodhya / Ram Janmabhoomi movement, which it made a central issue. The BJP consolidated its position through the elections of 1991 and 1996, emerging as the largest party in 1996. After a short-lived government in 1996, it led a coalition from 1998 to 1999 and was re-elected in October 1999; under Atal Behari Vajpayee the NDA government formed in 1999 completed a full term. The BJP’s rise thus transformed the party system from Congress dominance into competitive coalition politics — later (in 2014 and 2019) it won single-party majorities on its own.

6. In spite of the decline of Congress dominance, the Congress party continues to influence politics in the country. Do you agree? Give reasons.

ANSWER Yes, the Congress continued to influence politics, even after its dominance declined in 1989. Reasons: 1. It remained an important party and ruled the country more than any other party even after 1989 — it returned to power after the 1991 mid-term elections. 2. It led the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) to power in 2004 and 2009, and Dr. Manmohan Singh served two terms as Prime Minister; the party’s seats rose from 145 in 2004 to 206 in 2009. 3. Even when in opposition, the Congress shaped politics by supporting or opposing governments from outside — for example, it supported the United Front government in 1996 to keep the BJP out of power. 4. The new consensus on economic reforms was actually initiated by Congress governments (Rajiv Gandhi, and the Narasimha Rao–Manmohan Singh reforms of 1991), and most parties later accepted it. So although it lost the centrality it once enjoyed, the Congress stayed one of the two principal poles of national politics. (One may also note that its influence weakened sharply after 2014, when the BJP won majorities on its own.)

7. Many people think that a two-party system is required for successful democracy. Drawing from India’s experience of last 30 years, write an essay on what advantages the present party system in India has.

ANSWER India does not have a two-party system; it has a multi-party system that, since 1989, has worked mainly through coalitions. India’s experience shows that this system has real advantages for a large, diverse society. 1. Better representation of diversity: India is vast and plural — in language, region, religion and caste. A multi-party system allows many groups, including regional and caste-based parties, to find political representation that two parties alone could not provide. 2. A central role for regional parties: coalition politics gave state-level parties a share in national power, strengthening federalism and bringing regional aspirations into Central decision-making. 3. Inclusion of the deprived: the system gave political voice to the OBCs and Dalits (through Janata Dal-type formations and the BSP), advancing social justice and self-representation. 4. Checks on the misuse of power: coalition partners and outside supporters act as checks on any single party, encouraging negotiation, consensus and accountability. 5. Emergence of a working consensus: despite competition, the parties evolved a broad agreement on economic policy, backward-class claims and the role of state parties — giving stability of direction even amid changing governments. Conclusion: While critics point to instability and frequent compromises, India’s experience over the last three decades shows that its multi-party, coalition-based system is well suited to a society of such great diversity — it deepens representation and inclusion, and democracy in India is here to stay.

8. Read the passage and answer the questions below:

Party politics in India has confronted numerous challenges. Not only has the Congress system destroyed itself, but the fragmentation of the Congress coalition has triggered a new emphasis on self-representation which raises questions about the party system and its capacity to accommodate diverse interests, …. . An important test facing the polity is to evolve a party system or political parties that can effectively articulate and aggregate a variety of interests. — Zoya Hasan

(a) Write a short note on what the author calls challenges of the party system in the light of what you have read in this chapter.

ANSWER According to the author, the main challenges are: the collapse of the ‘Congress system’, which had earlier held together a broad coalition of interests; the fragmentation that followed, with many sections leaving the Congress to form their own parties; and a new emphasis on self-representation by various caste, regional and community groups. The real test, says Zoya Hasan, is to evolve a party system or parties that can articulate and aggregate this great variety of interests — that is, voice them and also combine them into workable policies and stable governments, rather than letting the polity splinter.

(b) Given an example from this chapter of the lack of accommodation and aggregation mentioned in this passage.

ANSWER An example is the Mandal issue: when the National Front government decided in 1990 to implement OBC reservation, the party system failed to accommodate both sides, and the country saw violent anti-Mandal protests. Similarly, the Ayodhya / Ram Janmabhoomi dispute sharply divided communities and parties over secularism, culminating in the demolition of the disputed structure in 1992 — showing the difficulty of accommodating and aggregating conflicting interests within the system.

(c) Why is it necessary for parties to accommodate and aggregate variety of interests?

ANSWER It is necessary because India is an extremely diverse society of many castes, regions, religions and languages. If parties only voiced separate, narrow interests without combining them, politics would become fragmented and unstable, leading to conflict. By accommodating and aggregating diverse interests, parties can build stable governments and consensus, give every group a stake in the system, resolve conflicts through democratic and legal means, and ensure that the deprived and marginalised are included — which keeps democracy effective, inclusive and durable.

Extra Practice Questions

Short Answer Type Questions

Q1. What was the ‘Congress system’, and when did it come to an end?

ANSWERThe ‘Congress system’ refers to the long period in which the Congress dominated Indian politics by itself acting as a broad coalition of diverse interests and social groups. It came to an end with the 1989 Lok Sabha elections, when the Congress (which had won 415 seats in 1984) was reduced to 197 and lost its central position, though it remained an important party.

Q2. What was the Mandal Commission, and what did it recommend?

ANSWERThe Mandal Commission was the Second Backward Classes Commission, appointed in 1978 and chaired by B.P. Mandal. It gave its recommendations in 1980, advising that ‘backward classes’ be understood as ‘backward castes’ and recommending the reservation of 27 per cent of seats in educational institutions and government jobs for OBCs, along with measures like land reform.

Q3. What was the Shah Bano case, and why did it become politically significant?

ANSWERIn the Shah Bano case (1985), the Supreme Court granted maintenance to a divorced Muslim woman. After protests by some Muslim leaders, the government passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, nullifying the judgment. The BJP criticised this as ‘appeasement’ of a minority, making the case central to debates on personal law, gender justice and secularism.

Q4. How did the BSP emerge as a political force?

ANSWERThe Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) grew out of BAMCEF (1978) and the Dalit Shoshit Samaj Sangharsh Samiti under the leadership of Kanshi Ram, and was founded in 1984. Based largely on Dalit voters in Punjab, Haryana and UP, it achieved a breakthrough in Uttar Pradesh in the 1989 and 1991 elections — the first time a party supported mainly by Dalit voters had such success in independent India.

Q5. How was the Ayodhya issue finally resolved?

ANSWERThe Ayodhya dispute was resolved through democratic and legal processes, ending with a 5-0 verdict of a constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on 9 November 2019. The verdict allotted the disputed site to the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teertha Kshetra Trust for the construction of a Ram temple and directed the government to allot an alternative site for a mosque to the Sunni Central Waqf Board.

Long Answer Type Questions

Q1. Explain how the era of coalition governments began and developed in India after 1989.

ANSWERThe 1989 elections defeated the Congress but gave no party a majority. As the largest party the Congress chose to sit in opposition, and the National Front (an alliance of the Janata Dal and regional parties) formed a government with outside support from the BJP and the Left Front, who both wanted to keep the Congress out. This began a long phase in which no single party won a clear Lok Sabha majority until 2014. The United Front government of 1996 was supported by the Congress (both wanting to keep the BJP out); the BJP-led coalition governed from 1998 to 1999, and the NDA under Vajpayee, re-elected in 1999, completed a full term. In 2004 the Congress-led UPA came to power and was re-elected in 2009. Throughout, regional and state-level parties played a crucial role in forming ruling alliances. The pattern shows that coalition politics became a long-term trend, the result of relatively silent changes — the weakening of the Congress and the rise of regional parties — over earlier decades.

Q2. Describe the political rise of the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) during this period.

ANSWERThe rise of the OBCs as a political force was a major long-term development. As support for the Congress among the backward castes declined, space opened for non-Congress parties. This first found national expression in the Janata Party government of 1977, whose constituents (like the Bharatiya Kranti Dal and the Samyukta Socialist Party) had a strong rural OBC base. In the 1980s the Janata Dal brought together a similar combination. The National Front’s decision to implement the Mandal Commission recommendations sharpened OBC identity: the intense national debate over reservation made OBC communities more aware of their identity and easier to mobilise. Many new parties demanded better educational and employment opportunities for OBCs and a fair share of political power, arguing that as a large segment of society the OBCs deserved adequate representation. The Supreme Court upheld OBC reservation in the Indira Sawhney case (1992), and today the policy has the support of all major parties.

Q3. Discuss the four elements of the new consensus that emerged among most political parties.

ANSWERDespite severe competition, a broad consensus emerged among most parties, consisting of four elements. First, agreement on the new economic policies: though many groups opposed them, most parties believe these reforms will bring prosperity, so they support them. Second, acceptance of the social and political claims of the backward castes: all parties now support reservation in education and employment for the ‘backward classes’ and want OBCs to get an adequate share of power. Third, acceptance of the role of state-level parties: the distinction between national and state-level parties has blurred, as regional parties now share power at the Centre and have played a central role in national politics. Fourth, an emphasis on pragmatic considerations rather than ideology: coalition politics has shifted the focus from ideological differences to power-sharing — most NDA parties did not accept the BJP’s Hindutva ideology, yet they governed together for a full term. Together these elements show that Indian politics has become more competitive yet rests on an implicit agreement among the main political actors.

MCQs & Assertion–Reason

1. The 1989 Lok Sabha elections are seen as marking the end of:

(a) the Emergency    (b) the ‘Congress system’    (c) the Janata Party    (d) coalition politics

2. The Mandal Commission was officially known as the:

(a) First Backward Classes Commission    (b) Kaka Kalelkar Commission    (c) Second Backward Classes Commission    (d) Kothari Commission

3. The Mandal Commission recommended reserving what percentage of seats for OBCs in education and government jobs?

(a) 15%    (b) 22.5%    (c) 27%    (d) 33%

4. The National Front government that took office in 1989 was led by:

(a) Chandrashekhar    (b) V. P. Singh    (c) Narasimha Rao    (d) Deve Gowda

5. The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) emerged under the leadership of:

(a) B. P. Mandal    (b) Kanshi Ram    (c) Karpoori Thakur    (d) Jyoti Basu

6. The idea of ‘Hindutva’ as the basis of Indian nationhood was popularised by:

(a) M. S. Golwalkar    (b) V. D. Savarkar    (c) Deen Dayal Upadhyaya    (d) A. B. Vajpayee

7. The Supreme Court upheld the implementation of OBC reservation in the:

(a) Shah Bano case    (b) Kesavananda Bharati case    (c) Indira Sawhney case    (d) Minerva Mills case

8. The Supreme Court’s constitutional bench delivered its verdict on the Ayodhya / Ram Janmabhoomi dispute on:

(a) 6 December 1992    (b) 9 November 2019    (c) 26 January 2020    (d) 15 August 2019

9. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government came to power for the first time in:

(a) 1996    (b) 1999    (c) 2004    (d) 2009

10. In which year did the BJP first win a single-party majority in the Lok Sabha on its own (282 seats)?

(a) 1999    (b) 2009    (c) 2014    (d) 2019

Answer key: 1-(b), 2-(c), 3-(c), 4-(b), 5-(b), 6-(b), 7-(c), 8-(b), 9-(c), 10-(c).

For each Assertion–Reason question, choose: (A) Both true and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion; (B) Both true but the Reason is not the correct explanation; (C) Assertion true, Reason false; (D) Assertion false, Reason true.

A-R 1. Assertion: The 1989 elections began a long era of coalition governments at the Centre.

Reason: No single party secured a clear majority of seats in any Lok Sabha election from 1989 until 2014.

A-R 2. Assertion: The decision to implement the Mandal Commission report led to violent anti-Mandal protests.

Reason: The decision reserved central government jobs for the Other Backward Classes, which was opposed by sections that lost out.

A-R 3. Assertion: Coal reserves were the central issue of Indian politics after 1989.

Reason: The Ayodhya dispute and the Mandal issue shaped politics in this period.

A-R 4. Assertion: Most parties in the NDA accepted the BJP’s Hindutva ideology.

Reason: Coalition politics has shifted the focus of parties from ideological differences to power-sharing arrangements.

A-R 5. Assertion: A broad consensus has emerged among most parties on the new economic policies.

Reason: Most parties believe these policies would lead the country to prosperity and economic power.

Answer key: 1-(A), 2-(A), 3-(D), 4-(D), 5-(A).

Exam Tips & Common Mistakes

How to score full marks in this chapter

Memorise the five developments of the late 1980s and the four elements of the new consensus — they are favourite questions. Keep a clear timeline (1984 Indira Gandhi’s assassination, 1988 Janata Dal, 1989 Congress defeat & National Front, 1990 Mandal, 1991 reforms & Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination, 1992 Babri demolition & Indira Sawhney verdict, 1996 United Front, 1998–99 NDA, 2004/2009 UPA, 2014/2019 BJP majority, 9 Nov 2019 Ayodhya verdict). For ‘support or oppose’ questions, give a balanced two-sided answer with a clear conclusion. Use the chapter’s own examples — National Front, United Front, NDA, UPA, BSP, Shah Bano, Mandal, Ayodhya — to show depth.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Confusing the National Front (1989, V. P. Singh) with the United Front (1996) — note who supported each from outside.
  • Mixing up the years — Mandal implementation (1990), Indira Sawhney verdict (1992) and the Ayodhya Supreme Court verdict (9 November 2019).
  • Calling the Mandal Commission the ‘first’ backward classes commission — it was the Second Backward Classes Commission.
  • Writing that India has a two-party system — it has a multi-party, coalition-based system.
  • Assuming the Congress disappeared after 1989 — it stayed influential and led the UPA in 2004 and 2009.
  • Leaving ‘support or oppose’ questions one-sided — always give both views and a reasoned conclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chapter 8 of Class 12 Political Science (Politics in India Since Independence) about?

Chapter 8, Recent Developments in Indian Politics, gives a synoptic view of Indian politics since the late 1980s — the end of Congress dominance, the era of coalition governments, the Mandal issue and the rise of OBC and Dalit politics, the Ayodhya dispute and the debate over secularism, the rise of the BJP, and the new consensus among most parties on economic policy, backward-class claims, state-level parties and pragmatic coalition politics.

What were the four elements of the new consensus among parties?

The four elements were: (1) agreement on the new economic policies; (2) acceptance of the social and political claims of the backward castes (OBC reservation); (3) acceptance of the role of state-level parties in national governance; and (4) an emphasis on pragmatic power-sharing rather than ideology in forming alliances.

How was the Ayodhya / Ram Janmabhoomi issue finally resolved?

It was resolved through the due process of law, ending with a 5-0 verdict of a constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on 9 November 2019, which allotted the disputed site to the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teertha Kshetra Trust for a temple and directed an alternative site for a mosque to the Sunni Central Waqf Board.

← Chapter 7: Regional Aspirations Politics in India Since Independence (all chapters) →
Scroll to Top